Tests What Code Review Can't

What if you never shipped a bug again?

Pie connects to your repo, tests every commit like a real user, and opens PRs to fix what breaks. No scripts. No noise. Just results.

PULL REQUEST
feat: proceed-to-cart button
CheckoutButton.tsx
scanning · 0%
1import { useState } from 'react';
2import { Button } from './ui';
3+import { useCart } from './cart';
4
5interface Props { product: Product }
6
7export function CheckoutButton({ product }: Props) {
8 const { addItem } = useCart();
9 const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
10
11 const handleClick = async () => {
12 setLoading(true);
13 await addItem(product);
14 };
15
16 return <Button onClick={handleClick} disabled={loading}>Proceed to cart</Button>;
17}
LIVE TEST
Walking through checkout like a user
staging.acme.com/checkout
Proceed to cart button isn't clickable — users can't reach checkout
FIX PR
Pie drafted the fix
pie BOT opened just now
fix: reset loading state so Proceed to cart stays clickable
ROOT CAUSE
handleClick() sets loading to true but never resets it — button stays disabled after the first click.
FIX APPLIED
+await addItem(product); setLoading(false);
CI passing Ready to merge
Pie is reading the diff pie · autonomous qa
Trusted by fast-moving engineering teams
Sound familiar?

Code review approved it.
The product broke anyway.

Production

Checkout total renders $0.00 for all orders

Discovered by a customer. 4 hours after deploy. CI was green.

847 errors in 30 min 12 customer reports
CI passed

PR #412 — Refactor payment reduce logic

Order total renders $0.00. Discount logic skips the merge after the reduce function changed.

3 approvals all checks pass merged to main

These are the bugs that pass every code review tool on the market. They don't live in the diff. They live in the running product. Pie catches them because Pie actually uses your product, the same way your customers do.

The numbers behind the gap

6.4x
more code generated by AI
That's 6.4 times more surface area to review, maintain, and break.
96%
of devs don't trust AI code
Only 48% check it before committing.
68%
more issues per AI-authored PR
CodeRabbit PR analysis, 2025
HOW PIE WORKS

Three steps to zero bugs

Connect your repo. Here's what happens when your next PR merges.

Code merges. CI is green.
All checks pass. Ships to production.
Refactor payment — migrate to PaymentIntents
● Merged
PIE SCANNING → AFFECTED FLOWS checkout flow refund flow
staging.yourapp.com/checkout
Checkout Cart
4242 •••• •••• 4242
$0.00
Complete Purchase
Checkout Failure
Caught! Customers can checkout for free.
Pie opened the app, ran the checkout flow, and caught the $0.00 bug. Code review missed it — the diff looked fine.
Minutes later, the fix is ready.
Pie traced the bug, wrote the patch, and opened a PR. Your team reviews and merges.
Fix verified
fix: checkout total shows $0.00 after discount
P
pie-bot
Before
$0.00
After
$49.99
CI passed No conflicts Ready to merge
Features

What Pie catches for you

Vision-based testing

Pie finds product bugs. Not coding errors.

Uses your product like customers do. Catches bugs code review can't.

Autofix

Pie finds the bug. Writes the fix. Review the PR, ship it.

Coverage stories

Full bug reports. Ranked by severity. Know what broke.

Auto-tracking

Push your code. Pie maps the impact. Retests affected flows.

Test generation

Pie finds the bug. Writes the test. Locks it down.

Zero friction

Built for engineering teams

< 5 min
From setup to first bugs found
No scripts. No setup. Nothing to maintain.
1 commit
to first results
0 steps
to set up
PRs
not tickets

Your team already has enough tools to maintain. Pie plugs into your existing workflow, runs in your CI, and delivers fixes as PRs. No DSL to learn. No scripts to debug. No weekly maintenance.

Works with the tools your team already uses

GitHub
GitLab
Web, iOS, Android
Your CI/CD
Build vs buy

You've probably tried building this yourself

Write test scripts
~120 hrs/mo
Build CI integration
~80 hrs/mo
Wire up alerting
~60 hrs/mo
Maintain scripts
~160 hrs/mo
Fix when it breaks
~80 hrs/mo
Monthly total
500+ hrs/mo
Or just use Pie.
5 minutes to set up. Maintained by us.
0 hrs

"I've basically been doing that same workflow on my own, and it would be nice to not have to develop that. That seems like something that's not a core value of our company."

— VP Engineering, 1000+ person engineering org
What teams are saying

Real results from real teams

An iOS-only crash that happened after three specific steps? Manual testing never would have caught that. Pie found it on the first scan.

— Mobile Test Lead, Consumer Tech Startup

We used to find regressions a week after they shipped. Now we catch them before the PR even merges. It changed how we think about testing.

— Engineering Manager, Series A Fintech

The autofix feature is honestly what sold us. Finding bugs is one thing. Getting a PR with the fix already written? That's next level.

— Senior Engineer, E-commerce Platform

Your team pushes code.
Pie makes sure it actually works.

Try it for free

Connect GitHub or GitLab and see results on your actual codebase. It's free, there's no demo to sit through, and nobody's going to call you.

Frequently Asked Questions

Code review tools analyze your code. Pie tests your running product. CodeRabbit can tell you if your checkout function looks correct. Pie actually clicks "Buy Now" on staging and confirms the payment goes through. They read diffs. We use the app.

You authorize Pie on GitHub, pick a repo, and paste your staging URL. That's it. No SDK, no test scripts, no config files. Pie figures out your user flows automatically by exploring your app.

Pie reads your commit diffs to understand what changed, then maps that to the user flows it discovered when it first explored your app. If your payment form changed, Pie tests checkout. If you touched the nav, it tests cross-page navigation. It's not random.

Yes. Pie tests iOS and Android apps in simulators, not just web. Same 2-click setup. Same autofix PRs. Mobile-specific bugs like gesture failures, deep link issues, and in-app purchase flows are all covered.

Pie only reports bugs it can reproduce. Every finding includes a step-by-step recording of how to trigger it. If Pie reports it, it's real. No flaky tests, no "works on my machine" arguments.

When Pie finds a bug, it doesn't just log it. It traces the issue back to the source code, identifies the likely root cause, and opens a PR with a suggested fix. You review and merge, or reject if it's wrong. Most fixes merge without changes.

Pie runs on secure, isolated infrastructure. Your code never leaves your repo, we only read the diffs. Your staging environment is accessed the same way your CI does. We're SOC 2 compliant. Reach out and we'll share the documentation.

You can run both, or let Pie take over entirely. Pie can analyze your existing test cases and rebuild them using AI, with zero ongoing maintenance. Most teams that migrate see better coverage and stop dealing with flaky tests. We'll help with the transition.

Pricing scales with your usage. We offer packages for teams of all sizes. Reach out and we'll put together a quote.

Not currently. Pie runs as a managed service. For teams with strict data residency requirements, reach out and we'll discuss options.